<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signature in the Cell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/</link>
	<description>A members&#039; forum for discussion of selected books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:09:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Randy wrote:

&quot;As I stated in one of my comments, one can even show that a system has a tendency to increase information.&quot;

Of course. A running system tends to increase entropy and thus Shannon information increases as they are proportional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;As I stated in one of my comments, one can even show that a system has a tendency to increase information.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course. A running system tends to increase entropy and thus Shannon information increases as they are proportional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mervin Bitikofer</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervin Bitikofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Randy.  I guess I&#039;m still learning how to navigate this forum and only saw these few early posts.  Your link took me to the mother-load.  Yikes!  The fire-hose is back.  It will take me more than I can do tonight to catch up on all of that; but I do see right away that the antibody question is one featured topic.
 
Right now my attention is also pulled towards another book of Dembski&#039;s I just finished, and I may try to start a separate topic thread about that.  (Unless one is already started and I just haven&#039;t clicked to the right place to see it.)
--Merv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Randy.  I guess I&#8217;m still learning how to navigate this forum and only saw these few early posts.  Your link took me to the mother-load.  Yikes!  The fire-hose is back.  It will take me more than I can do tonight to catch up on all of that; but I do see right away that the antibody question is one featured topic.<br />
 <br />
Right now my attention is also pulled towards another book of Dembski&#8217;s I just finished, and I may try to start a separate topic thread about that.  (Unless one is already started and I just haven&#8217;t clicked to the right place to see it.)<br />
&#8211;Merv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Merv, that&#039;s precisely my point in these &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../02/16/complex-specified-information-without-an-intelligent-source/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe it&#039;s clearer in some of the comments. There simply is no &quot;conservation principle&quot; for information. As I stated in one of my comments, one can even show that a system has a tendency to increase information. It is only one of the fatal errors of Meyer&#039;s argument. Go ahead and take your time to read all the posts and the comments. Time won&#039;t expire on these so go ahead and ask your questions
Randy&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Merv, that&#8217;s precisely my point in these <a href="../../../../02/16/complex-specified-information-without-an-intelligent-source/" rel="nofollow">posts</a>. Maybe it&#8217;s clearer in some of the comments. There simply is no &#8220;conservation principle&#8221; for information. As I stated in one of my comments, one can even show that a system has a tendency to increase information. It is only one of the fatal errors of Meyer&#8217;s argument. Go ahead and take your time to read all the posts and the comments. Time won&#8217;t expire on these so go ahead and ask your questions<br />
Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mervin Bitikofer</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervin Bitikofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Just finished reading this &amp; would love to carry on discussion.  Am I a day late &amp; dollar short?  I notice these posts are months old.
I did post my own review of the book on my own web site in case anyone wants to read of some of my impressions.
http://www.mbitikofer.com/opinions.html#ID
I thought it was at the Biologos site that I read one reaction in which Meyer&#039;s assertion that no new (or greater quantity) of specified information has ever been created in an [isolated] system.  Yet the reviewer I read insisted that this information conservation &#039;principle&#039; is broken every time our cells develop new antibodies to some newly evolved germ.  Now I can&#039;t find reference to the question, but I was curious if that is a serious challenge to Meyer and how it might be answered.
--Merv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished reading this &amp; would love to carry on discussion.  Am I a day late &amp; dollar short?  I notice these posts are months old.<br />
I did post my own review of the book on my own web site in case anyone wants to read of some of my impressions.<br />
<a href="http://www.mbitikofer.com/opinions.html#ID" rel="nofollow">http://www.mbitikofer.com/opinions.html#ID</a><br />
I thought it was at the Biologos site that I read one reaction in which Meyer&#8217;s assertion that no new (or greater quantity) of specified information has ever been created in an [isolated] system.  Yet the reviewer I read insisted that this information conservation &#8216;principle&#8217; is broken every time our cells develop new antibodies to some newly evolved germ.  Now I can&#8217;t find reference to the question, but I was curious if that is a serious challenge to Meyer and how it might be answered.<br />
&#8211;Merv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I look forward to the essay review in PSCF.

In the meantime, there is a thoughtful review (leaning negative but gracious in tone) at the BioLogos site from Christian biology Prof. Darrel Falk:
http://biologos.org/blog/signature-in-the-cell/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to the essay review in PSCF.</p>
<p>In the meantime, there is a thoughtful review (leaning negative but gracious in tone) at the BioLogos site from Christian biology Prof. Darrel Falk:<br />
<a href="http://biologos.org/blog/signature-in-the-cell/" rel="nofollow">http://biologos.org/blog/signature-in-the-cell/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/01/signature-in-the-cell/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>James Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=41#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I have read the book, and was impressed by the information. I do think the author could have written the book more succinctly, it&#039;s a bit wordy. But that is by no means critiquing the content. This book, along with several others, including Behe&#039;s &quot;Edge of Evolution&quot; present some serious challenges to the TE model. 

Another big one is a recent volume of ANYAS - v1178, 2009. The lead article is by James Shapiro...titled &quot;Revisiting the Central Dogma in the 21st Century&quot;. I am going to start a new post about that one...it&#039;s really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read the book, and was impressed by the information. I do think the author could have written the book more succinctly, it&#8217;s a bit wordy. But that is by no means critiquing the content. This book, along with several others, including Behe&#8217;s &#8220;Edge of Evolution&#8221; present some serious challenges to the TE model. </p>
<p>Another big one is a recent volume of ANYAS &#8211; v1178, 2009. The lead article is by James Shapiro&#8230;titled &#8220;Revisiting the Central Dogma in the 21st Century&#8221;. I am going to start a new post about that one&#8230;it&#8217;s really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

