Comments on: Historical causal analysis http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/13/historical-causal-analysis/ A members' forum for discussion of selected books Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:09:04 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Randy Isaac http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/13/historical-causal-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Randy Isaac Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:02:00 +0000 http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=55#comment-22 James, perhaps the inverse of your statement is even more evident: the more supernatural it gets, the stronger the ID argument is. Take it out of the scientific realm and there's a coherent and consistent story. Meyer's thesis is that the ID claims are valid within the scientific realm without recourse to supernatural beings or events. That's where the difficulty lies. James, perhaps the inverse of your statement is even more evident: the more supernatural it gets, the stronger the ID argument is. Take it out of the scientific realm and there’s a coherent and consistent story. Meyer’s thesis is that the ID claims are valid within the scientific realm without recourse to supernatural beings or events. That’s where the difficulty lies.

]]> By: ASA Voices http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/13/historical-causal-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-21 ASA Voices Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:53:42 +0000 http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=55#comment-21 <strong>Discussion of Signature in the Cell...</strong> Just a pointer to the comments that Randy Isaac is posting. ...... Discussion of Signature in the Cell…

Just a pointer to the comments that Randy Isaac is posting.
……

]]> By: James Patterson http://www.asa3online.org/Book/2010/01/13/historical-causal-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-20 James Patterson Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:04:36 +0000 http://www.asa3online.org/Book/?p=55#comment-20 I think I understand the science. If read by a Christian who understands the science, I don't think you could have stated the case *for* intelligent design any better that the above. The stronger the ID argument gets, the more supernatural it gets. And vice versa. I haven't forgotten about Meyer's book - I want to post an in-depth review/reply myself, along with similar posts regarding a couple of other works...Behe's Edge of Evolution, I think is worthy of review here. Unfortunately I don't have as much time as I would like... I have some replies from RTB re: the recent "More Than a Theory" review. Could someone recreate that original PSCF review here? I think I understand the science.

If read by a Christian who understands the science, I don’t think you could have stated the case *for* intelligent design any better that the above. The stronger the ID argument gets, the more supernatural it gets. And vice versa.

I haven’t forgotten about Meyer’s book – I want to post an in-depth review/reply myself, along with similar posts regarding a couple of other works…Behe’s Edge of Evolution, I think is worthy of review here. Unfortunately I don’t have as much time as I would like…

I have some replies from RTB re: the recent “More Than a Theory” review. Could someone recreate that original PSCF review here?

]]>