Chromosome 2 Fusion

By , on February 23rd, 2010%

I’m going to pull these chromosome 2 fusion comments into a new post. Interestingly, everyone acts as if this is new data. This has been known for decades, as long as karyotype analysis and chromosome banding studies have been around. The sequencing data has merely confirmed more dramatically the argument for a . . . → Read More: Chromosome 2 Fusion

17 comments - (Comments are closed)   Biological Evolution, Origins    

ID not science, should it be called Natural Philosophy?

By , on February 23rd, 2010%

I read this over on UcD:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-response-to-stephen-barr/

One can argue that as an empirical matter ID has failed to demonstrate that living things bear indicia of design.  Many scientists would disagree, but competing interpretations of the data are what good science is all about.  May the best interpretation prevail.  But some scientists go further than advancing competing interpretations . . . → Read More: ID not science, should it be called Natural Philosophy?

10 comments - (Comments are closed)   Intelligent Design, Philosophy of Science   ,  

 

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Email Notifications for Posts

Your email: