Over at BioLogos there has been discussion of use of the term BioLogos rather than Evolutionary Creation or Theistic Evolution. This comes out not in the post but in the comments.
I chimed in with my thoughts:
I prefer to use the term Evolutionary Creation rather than Theistic Evolution for at least two reasons:
1. EC makes it crystal clear that we stand in the same position as YEC and OEC in that we all believe “In the beginning God”
2. The noun is creation rather than evolution which indicates a better emphasis, ie we are creationists who also accept evolution not evolutionists who accept theism.
Yes I am probably tilting at windmills using a different definition, but this is one case where IMO it seems important but Biologos is fine by me if and when it gets accepted.
I certainly had not understood that this was their proposal but maybe I missed most of the early posts on the topic.
What do people think of the proposal?
Another very pleasant surprise is that Gregory Arago seems to be taking a much more reasonable position or maybe he is just expressing it in a better manner. He still objects to the use of evolution in contexts other than biology but then I object to the term TE although not in the fashion that he tends to.